View Post

What Do you see that could be improved in this Fladery Picture?

In Ban Grazing Allotments, Oppose Welfare Ranching, Protect The Wolves by Twowolves2 Comments

After watching Our Boys analyze their own fence.   This image came from our NE Washington Volunteer Huckleberry picker from the Smackout Meadows. Please note: this fladery did not even appear until long after the first depredation even with WDFW claiming it was present before the depredation even as it appeared in their updates. How Do We know this? Our …

View Post

F4WM–Foundation For Wildlife Management | Appears to be Offering Bounty for Wolves

In Oppose Welfare Ranching, Protect Idaho Wolves, Protect The Wolves, Sacred Resource Protection Zone by Twowolves14 Comments

Protect The Wolves™ is Investigating the Legal aspects in Idaho on this Organization. It appears that they are claiming they are working with IDFG, which should be illegal in itself. We need to let IDFG know we dissapprove of their working with this Organization, then take them to court to get them SHUT DOWN!!! Managing Wolves is Expensive and Hard …

View Post

First wolf hunting season since 2013 did not produce any surprises  | codyenterprise.com

In Protect The Wolves, Protect Yellowstone Wolves, Sacred Resource Protection Zone by Twowolves3 Comments

First wolf hunting season since 2013 did not produce any surprises according to the Cody Enterprise However, when Trophy Zones exceed Harvest Quota it is 100% unacceptable!! We will be adding to our petition that if they are going to continue to hunt Trophy Zones, to make it a draw only tag, with explicit number according to the quota set …

What is the fate of our wolves in Oregon?

In Protect The Wolves by Lynda1 Comment

Upon seeing news about a pair of wolves seen on trail cams near Mount Hood, the happiness was immediately replaced with concern as we saw this news spread everywhere. Most of us have seen how much livestock producers hate them and want them killed so they don’t have to do anything. However, we do know that there is at least …