Livestock killed by a wolf pack located at Profanity Peak in Ferry County, leading to lethal measures by the state to get rid of the wolves, were documented to be near the pack’s den. That’s according to a Washington State University researcher. But his findings may be creating a rift with the university.
The killing of livestock last summer prompted the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife in August to remove the wolf pack lethally — a controversial decision that pitted ranchers against wolf advocates. But the effort to remove them was called off in October after the state had killed about a dozen wolves.
Dr. Robert Wielgus, associate professor and director of the Large Carnivore Conservation Lab at WSU released his latest findings Tuesday. He also says that salt blocks, used by livestock to obtain essential minerals, were observed less than 700 feet from the den.
Several days after livestock arrived at the den site, wolves began depredating, or prey upon, the livestock, wrote Wielgus. Several were eventually killed by wolves.
“After a failure of subsequent non-lethal interventions to deter livestock depredations the wolf pack was lethally controlled,” wrote Wielgus.
Wielgus also claims that the “rancher involved did not sign and abide by the terms of a Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Cooperative Damage Prevention Agreement prior to lethal control” of the wolves and that the cattle remained in “high use” areas even after lethal measures were taken.
To distance itself from Weilgus’ findings, WSU put out a statement saying the findings “do not reflect the opinions or views of Washington State University” and that it will determine whether Weilgus’ press release violates university policies and/or state laws.
This isn’t the first time WSU has responded to a finding by Weilgus related to the Profanity Peak wolves. In a statement last August, the university called some of Weilgus’ statements “both inaccurate and inappropriate.”
Source: Livestock documented not far from Profanity Peak wolf den, researcher concludes | KING5.com
Comments
If the rancher didn’t sign and abide by the terms of a Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Cooperative Damage Prevention Agreement, the U.S. government had no right to take the lives of those wolves. Weilgus as much as served the livestock on a silver platter to those wolves right next to their den. He’s an Ass and his refusal to cooperate with wildlife conservation should never have been rewarded with help from our government. My tax dollars are paying for this man’s stubborness.
Sorry about wrong name in my previous post. Weilgus was not the rotten rancher.