50 State Table: Conflict of Interest Definitions on Elected Officials

In Protect The Wolves by Twowolves2 Comments

For Wolf Advisory Groups like that in Washington State amongst others. We have the research to begin putting a stop on Special Interest Participation in General as well as Under the Trusts.

Members on Washingtons WAG have an Interest, a Financial Interest due to their own businesses, as such are violating Washington States RCWS.

The Conflict of Interest is brought forward because they do not perform their position as mandated under the trusts for the General Public, only those that as he has stated have “skin in the game”. These members are not only elected officials, but also have a financial interest as such can not be allowed to participate.

 

Protect The Wolves™ will be relentless on this problem. We ask our followers to Join Us to begin pursuing this in Court. We have the Attorneys, We have the Grounds, We have The Proof, now just need your help to begin this process in Court

WashingtonA conflict of interest exists when a state officer has “an interest, financial or otherwise, direct or indirect, or engage in a business or transaction or professional activity, or incur an obligation of any nature, that is in conflict with the proper discharge of the state officer’s or state employee’s official duties.” Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 42.52.020.

 

RCW 42.52.020

Activities incompatible with public duties.

No state officer or state employee may have an interest, financial or otherwise, direct or indirect, or engage in a business or transaction or professional activity, or incur an obligation of any nature, that is in conflict with the proper discharge of the state officer’s or state employee’s official duties.

Source: 50 State Table: Conflict of Interest Definitions

Comments

  1. Pingback: 50 State Table: Conflict of Interest Definitions on Elected Officials | Protect The Wolves

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.